In general, Congress provided law that authorizes all veterans to claim $1,000,000.00 (plus) in damages for injury-to-persons, directly or indirectly occurring in connection with (or in any way incident to or arising out of the occupancy, use, services, operations or performance of work in connection with the Deed of Easement attached.
NSEA’s latest fillable pdf Notice of Claim form for all injured parties to complete, is attached for your review. NSEA has an email called “1st Step” that explains to injured citizens how to bring a civil action to redress their grievances resulting from ANY trespass by ANY other person. The action is brought as a “Constitutional Tort” action for any violation of the Oath of Office, and most specifically, the Constitutional / Congressional Mandates ordained by the people as defined in the Preamble to the Constitution for the United States of America, 1787, that all Federal, State, Municipal, Military, and interstate agencies, collectively defined as “persons” in Public Law 92-500, Sec 2., Sec. 502(5), to wit:
We the people [of the Almighty Creator] of the United States [of America “kingdom of heaven”], in order to form a more perfect union [not Union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility (a noun) [not tranquillize (verb) with poison], provide for the common [law] defense [civil monetary relief], promote the general [FRCP Rule 17(a)(1)] welfare [the health, happiness, and fortunes of the people], and secure the blessings of liberty [God-given rights to life, liberty and property] to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain [confer holy orders on all Oath Takers] and establish [set up] this Constitution for the United States of America [respectively the real “injured” parties in interest].
Civil statutory damages available for Constitutional / Congressional Tort violations constituting injury were established by Congress assembled on October 18, 1972. Those CPI adjusted damages available for injury to persons are provided for under CITIZEN SUITS, Sec. 505(a), and arising under FEDERAL ENVORCEMENT, Sec. 309(d) to wit:
“Any person [Oath of Office Takers at minimum] who violates section 301, 306, 307, … shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $60,000.00 per day for each of these unlawful violations, starting July 1, 1973 as confirmed in section 505(f).
Thank you my fellowcitizens,
“Mister you better find another line of work…this one sure don’t fit your pistol!” John Bernard Books (1895).
Their motive is to get rid of any impediment effecting their control of water. They remain in control by a simple DEED OF EASEMENTS.
An “encumbrance” is a claim of right upon Real estate/property (water).
“interstate compact[s]” are treaties between the states, ratified under the Articles of Confederation during the period after American independence in 1776 until the current U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1789, and are grandfathered and treated as interstate compacts. The attached is touted to be an interstate compact. To be an interstate compact, there is a specific requirement that non-discretionally burdens the interstate compact, that the interstate compact must adopt and enforce federal laws.
“Federal law” is the body of law created by the federal government of a country. A federal government is formed when a group of political units, such as states or provinces join together in a federation, delegating their individual sovereignty and many powers to the central government while retaining or reserving other limited powers. As a result, two or more levels of government exist within an established geographic territory. The body of law of the common central government is the federal law. On America and within the District of Columbia, the federal law is the law of the government of the United States. (See also ‘State of Union’)
The “United States of America (USA), commonly known as the United States (U.S.) or America,” is a federal republic composed of 50 states, a federal district, five major self-governing territories, and various possessionsupon which the people of the United States of America exist. The federal district is the District of Columbia also called Washington DC, of which is required to adopt and enforce Federal law, as the District of Columbia like the United States of America, and all of its citizens and sources, is subject to compliance with Public Law 92-500, 86 Stat. pg. 816-903, October 18th, 1972. It is declared an unlawful act justifying civil damages required to be paid via a comprehensive insurance program with limits of not less than, Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjusted rate of $12.5 million for each occurrence covering liability for injury to persons and damages to property directly or indirectly occurring in connection with said Deed of Easements. It was agreed that the United States of America shall be made an additional insured. The United States of America is the people of the Untied States of America as contemplated in the Preamble to the Constitution for the Untied States of America, respectively, “the people.”
Accordingly, all (every single one of) the people of the United States of America, the additionally insured, have, since June 23rd, 1983 (agreement), had a right-of-claim to serve the Grantee your “Claim of Injury” as provided for under Sec. 2 and Sec 505 CITIZEN SUITS, and more specifically arising under Sec. 309(d). After CPI Adjustment (provided for under the Judiciary Act 1789), $50,000.00 per day per violation since July 1, 1973 as provided under 505(f) Xs 3 for RICO = $150,000.00 in civil damages due the injured person per violation. A claim of injury resulting from a violation of Sec. 301, 306, and 307 for only one month (30.5 days) = $13,750,000.00.
The legally established amount of $12.5 million already provided and available to the people of the United States of America as defined and agreed upon in paragraph 11 in the Deed of Easements agreement, to be compensated per occurrence of personal injury occurred upon or in connection with any deed of easement of any Interstate Agency operating in agreement of an Interstate Compact providing such Deed of Easement to allow injury to persons by poison in our tap waters, waters provided to us by agents of the Interstate Compact operating on an easement that promotes such practice regardless of what the law of right and clean water mandates.
As the old saying goes…if you can’t beat-em, then join-em. Join-em in a claim for damages filed with the proper responsible entity, the WASHINGTON METROPOLITIAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY (Grantee). In addition to the maximum claim amount awarded, the agent of the United States responsible SHALL BE FIRED and BANNED as a “qualified public servant/corporate agent” for life.
Washington, D.C., formally the District of Columbia and commonly referred to as "Washington", "the District", or simply "D.C.", is the capital of the United States and real home of the United States Congress.
The Congress meets in the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C. Both senators and representatives are chosen through direct election, though vacancies in the Senate may be filled by a gubernatorial appointment. Congress has 535 voting members: 435 Representatives and 100 Senators. The House of Representatives has six non-voting members representing Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Washington, D.C. in addition to its 435 voting members. Although they cannot vote, these members can sit on congressional committees and introduce legislation. Public Law 92-500 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 was enacted by Congress Assembled on October 18, 1972.
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) mandated point source elimination of all discharges of all pollution into publicly owned treatment works (municipal sewer easements), and on July 1, 1973, Sec. 505(f) affirmed such non-compliance an unlawful act in violation of, at minimum, Sec. 301, 306, and 307, which such unlawful act would be to wit:
Sec. 301 mandated that, except in compliance with the FWPCA, the “discharge of any pollutant shall be unlawful.” Sec. 301(f) defines pollutant as a chemical and biological warfare agent which is man-made and man-induced pollution that originates from toilet and related fixtures of sources. (See Sec. 306(a)(2), (3))
Sec. 306 mandated a new national standard of performance that requires application of best available technology to meet “a standard permitting no discharge of pollutants.” A standard mandated application of technology to eliminate unlawful discharge of chemical and biological warfare agents (poisons) from homes, businesses, and all buildings having toilets from which there may be a discharge of man-made and man-induced pollution. (See Sec. 502(19))
Sec. 307 mandated application of best available technology at-source to contain and control toxic pollutants, such technology to remove all toxic pollutants in compliance with new effluent standards permitting no discharge of pollutants into any right-of-way easements of any interstate compact easements.
The FWPCA, Sec. 402(k), further mandated all easements of any interstate compact agency’s sewer utility right-of-ways (all municipalities) a “zero-point-discharge” (ZPD) Federal Zone that is subject to compliances with the FWPCA standards and limitations and is required to have technology at each of their sources that eliminates their discharge to meet a standard permitting no discharge of “toxic” pollutants into any easement or right-of-ways that would be “injurious to human health.”
The “National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System” defined under Sec. 402 mandated a ZPD Standard for all State, political subdivision, and interstate agency franchised municipal easements in interest of public health and welfare, and more specifically, to preserve the physical, chemical, and biological integrity of Nations waters. In laymen’s terms, a new household Appliance of technology was mandated by this congressional act to be applied at every building, residential home, commercial structure, industrial facilities, etc., BEFORE POLLUTION/SEWAGE could be introduced into a public right-of-way or easement of the interstate agencies, aka States of the Union and their political subdivisions and municipalities operating under the Interstate Compact Agreement and the hereto attached Deed of Easements, June 23rd, 1983. Said Deed of Easements was subject to compliance with interstate cooperation and uniform laws, to wit:
33 USC 1253: Interstate cooperation and uniform laws Text contains those laws in effect on February 27, 2018
From Title 33-NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS
CHAPTER 26-WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL
SUBCHAPTER I-RESEARCH AND RELATED PROGRAMS
§1253. Interstate cooperation and uniform laws
(a) The Administrator shall encourage cooperative activities by the States for the prevention, reduction, and elimination of pollution, encourage the enactment of improved and, so far as practicable, uniform State laws relating to the prevention, reduction, and elimination of pollution; and encourage compacts between States for the prevention and control of pollution.
(b) The consent of the Congress is hereby given to two or more States to negotiate and enter into agreements or compacts, not in conflict with any law or treaty of the United States[such as this very one], for (1) cooperative effort and mutual assistance for the prevention and control of pollution and the enforcement of their respective laws relating thereto, and (2) the establishment of such agencies, joint or otherwise, as they may deem desirable for making effective such agreements and compacts. No such agreement or compact shall be binding or obligatory upon any State a party thereto unless and until it has been approved by the Congress.
(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title I, §103, as added Pub. L. 92–500, §2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 818 .)
The old 1948 municipality wastewater “management” (sewer service via public right-of-ways) standard causes trillions of annual dollars of unjust enrichments to be realized by deep state managed districts of physically-sick populations. Sewer related revenue provides for 40+% of municipal budgets nationally. The old standard provided in the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1948 that mandated connecting to a public sewer or using a septic tank system, was amended in its entirety pursuant to ratification by Congress Assembled as Public Law 92-500 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, Sec. 2. – 13, by a Congressional Act on October 18, 1972, was a necessary law and strict liability statute mandated by Act of Congress to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of our nations’ waters, a new standard mandating “elimination” of pollution at-source. All Real estate easements and right-of-ways of buildings, structures, and facilities having receiving water and sewer services delivered to the consumer via a deeded easement and right-of-way agreement. As a standard rule, all parties to any agreement must come with clean hands, meaning they can’t be persons committing crimes punishable as felonies under federal law. Such status vitiates all standing in honor and any agreement made by such an individual or individuals is done with intent to harm and such ‘agreement’ is VOID de nova.
One such attached agreement was recorded onto the public records of Washington D.C. on July 24th of 1984(AM 9: 59) as a DEED OF EASEMENTS, purportedly authorized (on the signature page) under authority of “District of Columbia of the United States of America” by act and deed of:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Acting by and through the ADMINISTRATION OF GENERAL SERVICES, William B. Jenkins, TITLE: Director of Real Estate Division (ATTEST: Ellen W. Dayton, Notary Public in and for District of Columbia); and the WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY Acting by and through its GENERAL MANAGER, Joseph J. Muldoon, TITLE: [Director, Office of REAL Estate]
This act allowing sewers to be continued was under the “clean water rule” also known as “Clean Water Act,” which was no “Act” at all, created by the United States Environmental Protection Agency so as to enable DEEP STATE to continue business as usual regarding their discharges of pollution, to continue the practice of “wastewater management” as opposed to “eliminate discharge of all pollutants.” This was done by application of Real estate law, administered by members of an international BAR association, as a DEED OF EASEMENTS to allow the practice of publicly owned treatment works, aka public sewer, etc, to continue unobstructed.
It is purported in the DEED OF EASEMENTS that such act was, on the 23rd day of June, 1983, under and pursuant to the powers and authorities contained in the provisions of the Act of October 23, 1962, (76 Stat. 1129, 40 USC 319), hereinafter called the Grantor.
Then, the subject DEED OF EASEMENTS in paragraph 1. purports “The Grantor, pursuant to 40 USC 319 and paragraph 20 of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Compact, consented to and enacted by Congress in Public Law 89-744, [apparently never ratified by Act of Congress Assembled, but] ‘approved’ November 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1324, does hereby grant and quitclaim to the Grantee, its successors and assigns (hereinafter the terms Grantor and Grantee shall include their successors and assigns) the hereinbelow described permanent and assignable, subsurface and surface, easements, rights and rights-of-way for rapid transit facilities, in, upon, under, and across a part of lot 25 (also known as Tax Lot 806), Square 200 [as defined in the attached “department deed of easements] recorded in the Office of the Surveyor of the District of Columbia in Book 58, Page 111, described in three pieces of land as follows: …
And paragraph 11. purports “Grantee will have a comprehensive insurance program with limits of not less than $5 million for each occurrence covering liability for injury to persons and damage to property directly or indirectly occurring in connection with or in any way incident to or arising out of the occupancy, use, service, operations or performance of work in connection with this easement. I is agree that the United States of America shall be made an additional insured in such rapid transit operation insurance.
And is concluded in paragraph 12 that established a conditional limitation and requirement that the Grantee shall comply with all applicable Federal, state, municipal and local laws, and the rules, orders, regulations and requirements of the Federal Government. The Grantee [WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY] appoints Joseph J. Muldoon as its attorney-in-fact, for the purpose of acknowledging this Deed of Easements to be the act and deed of Grantee.
As District of Columbia is in fact subject to the United Kingdom Parliament, notice the “date” of this “Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.” (they didn’t waste any time claiming rights to act within this UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEED OF EASEMENTS. (NOTE, discussion on UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEED OF EASEMENTS has a 5 minute delay before the discussion begins)