N. S. E. A. INTERNATIONAL

*

N. S. E. A. INTERNATIONAL *

Welcome Everyone.

American Nationals Clean Environment Site.

Welcome to NSAE International. The National Standards Environmental Agency website. We are dedicated to fostering a sustainable future by holding those accountable for environmental degradation.

To the corporations whose actions impact our air, water, and land: your responsibility is not just to profit but to protect our planet for generations to come. We urge you to minimize pollution and adopt sustainable practices.

Our goal is to ensure that every entity recognizes its role in preserving the environment. Together, we can forge a path towards a cleaner, healthier world. We hope you engage with our resources and commit to change. Thank you for your attention and commitment to a brighter future.

NSEA.us

Download and share

N.S.E.A. International

*

N.S.E.A. International *

Solar Panels & Wind Turbines

Solar panels can be seen as a double-edged sword when considering their overall impact on the environment and society. While they offer a renewable source of energy, several factors contribute to the argument that they may cause more harm than good.

Firstly, the manufacturing process of solar panels involves the use of hazardous materials, including silicon, metals, and other chemicals. The extraction and refinement of these materials can lead to significant environmental degradation. Mining operations can result in habitat destruction, water pollution, and soil erosion. Additionally, some solar panels contain toxic substances that pose risks during their production and disposal stages.

Secondly, the energy input required for the manufacturing of solar panels is substantial. Although they generate clean energy once installed, the carbon footprint associated with their production can be considerable. This means that the initial environmental impact might offset the clean energy they produce during their lifetime.

Moreover, the lifespan of solar panels typically ranges between 25 to 30 years, but the disposal of old or damaged panels presents another challenge. Currently, recycling processes for solar panels are not well established. Many panels end up in landfills, where they can contribute to environmental pollution if not properly managed.

Additionally, solar farms often require vast amounts of land, leading to further habitat loss and fragmentation. In certain cases, these installations compete with agricultural land, potentially threatening food supply and local economies.

Lastly, the development of solar energy projects can sometimes lead to social conflicts. Local communities may oppose massive solar farms for various reasons, including land use changes and perceived negative impacts on their surroundings. The displacement of local wildlife and disruption of ecosystems can also breed resentment toward renewable energy initiatives that are otherwise intended to benefit the environment.

In conclusion, while solar panels have the potential to be part of the solution to our energy needs, it is essential to consider these various harms. From manufacturing processes to disposal challenges and social impacts, the broader implications of solar energy cannot be overlooked. A balanced approach that addresses these issues is critical for ensuring that renewable energy truly serves the greater good.

Wind turbines have been touted as a clean and renewable energy source, but there are several reasons to argue that they may cause more harm than good. One major concern is their impact on wildlife. Birds and bats can be significantly harmed by turbine blades, with studies indicating that thousands of these creatures die each year due to collisions. This loss of wildlife not only disrupts local ecosystems but can also contribute to declines in species populations.

Additionally, the manufacturing and installation of wind turbines often involve substantial environmental costs. The production of materials for turbines, such as steel and concrete, requires energy-intensive processes that can result in significant carbon emissions. Furthermore, the mining of rare earth metals, necessary for turbine components, can lead to habitat destruction and pollution, offsetting the supposed environmental benefits of wind energy.

Another issue is the noise pollution generated by wind turbines. The sound produced can be bothersome to nearby residents, leading to decreased quality of life and potential health issues. The phenomenon known as "wind turbine syndrome" describes the range of adverse health effects reported by those living in proximity to wind farms, including sleep disturbances and anxiety.

Lastly, while wind energy is renewable, it is not without its intermittency issues. Wind does not blow consistently, and the reliance on wind energy can lead to energy shortages during periods of low wind. This can necessitate the use of backup power sources, often fossil fuels, thereby undermining the goal of reducing carbon emissions.

In summary, while wind turbines present an alternative energy solution, their environmental impacts, effects on wildlife, social consequences, and challenges related to energy consistency raise valid concerns about whether they truly achieve the sustainability we strive for.

Embracing the Future of Sustainable Living

Safe drinking water is a fundamental human right, essential for the health and well-being of every individual. True belief in this right encompasses the idea that access to clean water should be universal, transcending socio-economic boundaries. Safe water is not just a convenience; it is a necessity for life. However, as we witness increasing pollution and contamination of natural water sources, the urgency to protect this vital resource has never been clearer. Communities everywhere are standing up, realizing that the safety of their water supply is directly linked to their overall health, economic stability, and environmental integrity.

The establishment of an Environmental Court of the People could empower citizens to take a stand against those who endanger this crucial resource. Such a court would serve as a legal platform where communities can seek justice against corporations or individuals who willfully poison water supplies. By integrating constitutional law into environmental protection, this court would underscore the importance of water safety as a legal right and hold accountable those whose actions threaten public health. With the proper legal structures in place, we could create a more proactive approach to environmental stewardship, enabling communities to actively participate in safeguarding their water.

Public support and engagement in this initiative are vital to its success. An Environmental Court of the People would not only provide a means for addressing grievances but also foster a collective responsibility toward protecting our water resources. By upholding the principle that every person deserves access to safe drinking water, we can pave the way for a healthier future. The call for accountability in water protection emphasizes that we are all stewards of this essential resource, and together, we can work towards a world where clean water is the standard, not the exception.

Safe Drinking Water Act

The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) was originally passed by Congress in 1974 to protect public health by regulating the nation’s public drinking water supply

NSEA International is private, non-commercial, non-political in capita sovereign body authority of, for, and by the people. without the UNITED STATES.  NSEA International draws our authority from the Bill of Rights having only 13 Articles last ratified (1819).  The founders have a Peace Treaty with the UNITED STATES (a corporation with DUNS number 048163723).  America’s Reconstruction Project – American nationals for clean water, clean air, clean food and clean government.  Go the the ids-badges-tags tab to find out how to become a part of our private association to clean the Environment.

Every single house in the United States of America is operating in violation of the federal Public Law 92-500 (Public Health Code), aka Clean Water Act of 1972.  Each home is currently discharging toxic and hazardous poisons into our drinking water supplies nationally due to gross negligence on the part of the federal, state and local governments to adopt and enforce the Public Health Code in beginning July 1,1973 due to a major conflict of interest.  The result is millions of pounds of toxic carcinogens and many other health threatening pollutants being introduced into our public drinking water supplies and our oceans, killing us and our aquatic life and destroying the carbon sequestering capacity of our oceans.

This Program is designed to:

  • stop discharges of toxic pollutants into our drinking water supplies

  • stop discharges of toxic pollutants into our oceans

  • bring every home (onshore facility) into compliance with the Public Health Code

  • provide a means to release each and every person, the owner and or operator of the facilities, from their criminal liabilities

  • transfer the liability to the state licensed entities that allowed the transaction of the property operating in violation of the Public Health Code

  • enable civil damages to be collected from the insurance companies of those liable state licensed entities

  • enable us to take back control of our water

  • enable us to take back control of our welfare

  • enable us to take back control of our government

  • enable us to become self sustainable

  • create a Green Economic Stimulus Program that will stimulate our Nation’s overall ecomomy…rapidly

  • It all begins with an idea. Maybe you want to launch a business. Maybe you want to turn a hobby into something more.

  • It all begins with an idea. Maybe you want to launch a business. Maybe you want to turn a hobby into something more.

  • It all begins with an idea. Maybe you want to launch a business. Maybe you want to turn a hobby into something more.